Pakistan vs Sri Lanka Dream11 Prediction: 2nd T20I fantasy picks, suggested XI, Captain, Vice-Captain
Pakistan vs Sri Lanka Dream11 Prediction for the second T20I at Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium is shaped by the opening match, in which Pakistan chased down Sri Lanka’s 182/8 to win by four wickets. Sahibzada Farhan led the chase with 89, while Maaz Sadaqat added a half-century. Sri Lanka’s most productive batter was Lahiru Udara, whose 91 off 55 balls kept his side competitive.
For fantasy selection, the first match gives a useful indication of batting roles and bowling involvement. Farhan and Maaz made the most of their top-order opportunities, while Udara demonstrated that Sri Lanka’s batting can produce a substantial individual score even in a losing effort. Naseem Shah’s three wickets also make Pakistan’s pace attack worth examining closely.
The key is not to select every player who performed well once. Fantasy teams should balance top-order batters with bowlers likely to receive a full workload, while checking the confirmed playing XIs before the match. Pakistan lead the three-match series 1–0, so Sri Lanka need a stronger collective performance to level it. For this contest, the most useful selections are players with clear batting positions or reliable bowling responsibilities rather than names chosen solely on reputation.
Match Details
| Match | Date | Time | Venue | Tournament |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pakistan vs Sri Lanka, 2nd T20I | 11 October 2026 | 6:30 PM IST / 6:00 PM Pakistan time | Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium, Rawalpindi | Sri Lanka tour of Pakistan 2026 |
The scheduled local start is 6:00 PM in Pakistan, equivalent to 6:30 PM IST.
Recent Fantasy-Relevant Form
Pakistan
| Player | Recent Performance | Fantasy Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Sahibzada Farhan | 89 off 53 balls in the 1st T20I | Opening batter with the clearest recent evidence of a major innings |
| Maaz Sadaqat | 50 off 29 balls | Attacked from the top order and contributed a substantial score |
| Fakhar Zaman | 21 off 13 balls | Aggressive opening option who can score quickly |
| Naseem Shah | 3 wickets for 36 runs | Wicket-taking threat with a role in the pace attack |
| Mohammad Imran | 2 wickets for 21 runs | Took two wickets on T20I debut and completed four overs |
Pakistan’s opening-match performance offers evidence for both batting and bowling selections. Farhan and Maaz are the obvious batting candidates, but Naseem and Imran also demonstrated that wickets were available for Pakistan’s seamers.
Sri Lanka
| Player | Recent Performance | Fantasy Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Lahiru Udara | 91 off 55 balls | Dominant batting performance and the strongest recent Sri Lankan batting signal |
| Kamindu Mendis | 23 off 18 balls | Made a useful middle-order contribution |
| Dasun Shanaka | 18 off 15 balls, including two sixes | Lower-middle-order power-hitting potential |
| Maheesh Theekshana | 2 wickets for 36 runs | Took two wickets, although the cost of those wickets matters |
| Eshan Malinga | 2 wickets for 33 runs | Claimed two wickets during Pakistan’s chase |
Udara’s innings makes him difficult to overlook, but Sri Lanka’s bowling also produced wickets despite Pakistan reaching the target. Theekshana and Eshan Malinga merit consideration, although their economy and the opposition’s successful chase are reasons not to treat the wicket tally as the whole story.
Probable Playing XI & Availability
The first T20I scorecard provides the best available starting point for likely selections. These are probable, not confirmed, XIs; check the official team sheets at the toss.
Pakistan Probable XI
| Player | Fantasy Role |
|---|---|
| Sahibzada Farhan | BAT |
| Fakhar Zaman | BAT |
| Maaz Sadaqat | AR |
| Saim Ayub | AR |
| Hasan Nawaz | BAT |
| Khawaja Nafay | WK |
| Shadab Khan | AR |
| Naseem Shah | BOWL |
| Mohammad Imran | BOWL |
| Razaullah | BOWL |
| Sufyan Moqim | BOWL |
Sri Lanka Probable XI
| Player | Fantasy Role |
|---|---|
| Kamil Mishara | WK |
| Lahiru Udara | BAT |
| Kusal Mendis | WK/BAT |
| Kamindu Mendis | AR |
| Sahan Arachchige | AR |
| Dasun Shanaka | AR |
| Dunith Wellalage | AR |
| Maheesh Theekshana | BOWL |
| Dushmantha Chameera | BOWL |
| Eshan Malinga | BOWL |
| Nuwan Thushara | BOWL |
These combinations are based on the first-match scorecard and the announced series squads. Changes are possible, so remove any player not named in the confirmed XI.
Fantasy Pitch & Venue Analysis
Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium produced a first-innings total of 182/8 in the opening match. That score proved competitive but not enough to defend, as Pakistan reached 187/6 in 18.5 overs. The match suggests that batters who settle in can score quickly, while bowlers still have opportunities to take wickets.
| Fantasy Venue Factor | Value |
|---|---|
| Sri Lanka first innings | 182/8 |
| Pakistan chase | 187/6 |
| Result | Pakistan won by 4 wickets |
For fantasy selection, the first match supports a balanced approach rather than loading up exclusively on batters or bowlers. Udara’s innings shows the potential reward for selecting a batter capable of batting deep, while Naseem’s three wickets underline the value of wicket-taking bowlers. One match is not enough to establish a permanent venue trend, so avoid treating this result as a guarantee of another high-scoring game.
Player-by-Player Fantasy Analysis
Wicketkeepers
Kusal Mendis: The Sri Lankan captain was dismissed for one in the opening match. His batting position could give him an opportunity to respond, and wicketkeeping adds another way to collect fantasy points. His low score in the first game is a warning against assuming consistency, but it is not enough by itself to rule him out.
Khawaja Nafay: Nafay remained unbeaten on 12 from seven balls during Pakistan’s chase. That was a short innings, so there is limited evidence about his scoring ceiling. He is worth considering if he is confirmed in the XI, particularly for fantasy combinations that need a second wicketkeeper.
Batters
Sahibzada Farhan: Farhan’s opening role and ability to bat deep make him a leading candidate. His 89 was built over 53 balls, giving him time to accumulate runs rather than relying only on a late cameo. The risk is that another early dismissal would sharply reduce his opportunity.
Lahiru Udara: Udara produced the standout innings of the first match, scoring 91 from 55 balls. His ability to keep scoring through the innings makes him a compelling option even though Sri Lanka lost. The main concern is whether he can reproduce that level of output against a Pakistan attack that will have studied his first-match innings.
Fakhar Zaman: Fakhar’s 21 from 13 balls provided Pakistan with a quick start. His aggressive approach can deliver boundaries early, but it also brings dismissal risk. He is a more attack-oriented choice than a player selected primarily for consistency.
Maaz Sadaqat: His 50 from 29 balls demonstrated both scoring speed and the ability to turn a start into a substantial innings. Because he contributed in the chase’s second-wicket partnership, his role deserves attention again. His precise bowling workload should not be assumed solely from his all-rounder classification.
All-Rounders
Saim Ayub: Saim made one run in the opening match and took one wicket. The batting return was small, but his potential contribution with the ball gives him another avenue to affect fantasy scores. Include him only if the confirmed role suggests he will be used meaningfully in both disciplines.
Shadab Khan: Shadab took a wicket in the first T20I and can add batting points if Pakistan need a contribution from the lower middle order. His appeal depends on the amount of bowling responsibility he receives and whether he gets time at the crease.
Kamindu Mendis: Kamindu scored 23 from 18 balls in the first match, offering Sri Lanka a stabilising middle-order contribution. He can be useful if the top order falls early, although his exact bowling workload should be checked rather than assumed.
Dasun Shanaka: Shanaka’s 18 included two sixes, giving Sri Lanka some late-innings power. His batting position may limit the number of deliveries he faces, so his selection is more attractive when building a team that accepts greater volatility.
Bowlers
Naseem Shah: Three wickets in the opening match make Naseem Pakistan’s most compelling recent bowling selection. He can create value by striking during the powerplay and returning later in the innings. His main risk is that wicket-taking spells can vary from match to match.
Mohammad Imran: Imran claimed two wickets on debut and completed his four overs for 21 runs. That is meaningful evidence of both workload and wicket-taking involvement. It is still only one international performance, so expectations should remain measured.
Maheesh Theekshana: Theekshana took two wickets but conceded 36 runs. His fantasy appeal rests on his ability to take wickets, especially if Pakistan’s batters attack him. The concern is that an expensive spell can offset the value of those dismissals.
Eshan Malinga: Eshan also took two wickets in the first T20I. That makes him worth considering as a bowling alternative, but Pakistan successfully chased the target, so his wicket tally should be weighed alongside the broader result.
Also Check: Pakistan vs Sri Lanka Prediction, 2nd T20I, Sri Lanka Tour of Pakistan 2026
Safe Fantasy Picks
| Player | Team | Role | Why Consider Him? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sahibzada Farhan | Pakistan | BAT | Opening role and a substantial first-match innings |
| Lahiru Udara | Sri Lanka | BAT | Demonstrated the ability to bat deep and score at a strong rate |
| Maaz Sadaqat | Pakistan | AR | Top-order batting contribution and potential additional involvement |
| Naseem Shah | Pakistan | BOWL | Three wickets in the opening game |
| Mohammad Imran | Pakistan | BOWL | Completed four overs and took two wickets on debut |
No pick is risk-free. These players have the clearest combination of recent involvement and a defined role, but their inclusion should still depend on the confirmed XI and match conditions.
Differential Picks
| Player | Team | Role | Differential Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kamindu Mendis | Sri Lanka | AR | Can contribute from the middle order and may offer additional value if used with the ball |
| Eshan Malinga | Sri Lanka | BOWL | Took two wickets in the first match and is an alternative to Sri Lanka’s better-known bowling names |
| Khawaja Nafay | Pakistan | WK | Could offer a different selection profile if promoted or given a larger batting opportunity |
These are role-based differential ideas, not claims about actual fantasy ownership. Check the final batting order and confirmed selection before using the more uncertain options.
Players to Avoid
| Player | Fantasy Risk |
|---|---|
| Kusal Mendis | His first-match dismissal for one creates uncertainty, although his role remains important |
| Dasun Shanaka | His lower-middle-order position may restrict the number of balls he faces |
| Khawaja Nafay | His first-match contribution was brief, so his batting opportunity remains less established than that of the top order |
These players are not poor cricketers; the concern is the balance between likely involvement and the risk of a limited fantasy return.
Captain Options
Captain Option 1 — Sahibzada Farhan
Farhan is the preferred Captain for a team prioritising a top-order batter with a clear role. He has the opportunity to face a substantial number of deliveries and showed in the opening match that he can convert that opportunity into a major score. The downside is straightforward: if Sri Lanka remove him early, much of the expected batting contribution disappears.
Captain Option 2 — Lahiru Udara
Udara is the alternative for those willing to back Sri Lanka’s leading batting option despite the team’s defeat. His 91 demonstrated that he can play a long innings and keep scoring against Pakistan’s attack. The risk is that Pakistan may adjust their plans after the first match, and repeating a score of that size should not be expected.
Vice-Captain Options
Vice-Captain Option 1 — Maaz Sadaqat
Maaz is a useful Vice-Captain candidate because his first-match contribution came at a scoring rate that helped Pakistan control the chase. He offers a different profile from Farhan, and his value increases if he again gets a substantial batting opportunity. His bowling involvement should be treated as a bonus only if the match role supports it.
Vice-Captain Option 2 — Naseem Shah
Naseem is the bowling-led alternative. His three-wicket return gives him a credible route to a strong fantasy score without needing a substantial batting contribution. The risk is that wickets are less predictable than batting opportunity, and a quieter spell would leave fewer ways to accumulate points.
Suggested Fantasy XI
| Role | Player | Team |
|---|---|---|
| WK | Kusal Mendis | Sri Lanka |
| WK | Khawaja Nafay | Pakistan |
| BAT | Sahibzada Farhan | Pakistan |
| BAT | Fakhar Zaman | Pakistan |
| BAT | Lahiru Udara | Sri Lanka |
| AR | Maaz Sadaqat | Pakistan |
| AR | Saim Ayub | Pakistan |
| AR | Kamindu Mendis | Sri Lanka |
| BOWL | Naseem Shah | Pakistan |
| BOWL | Mohammad Imran | Pakistan |
| BOWL | Maheesh Theekshana | Sri Lanka |
Captain: Sahibzada Farhan
Vice-Captain: Naseem Shah
Fantasy Team Strategy
The combination gives Pakistan a slight majority because its top-order batters and pace bowlers produced strong returns in the first T20I. Farhan and Fakhar cover the opening phase, while Maaz adds another batting selection who has already shown he can make a substantial contribution. Nafay is included as a second wicketkeeper, but his place should be reconsidered if he is not confirmed or is expected to bat too low.
Sri Lanka’s batting is represented by Udara and Kusal Mendis, with Kamindu offering a middle-order alternative. The bowling selections balance Pakistan’s seam threat with Theekshana’s spin. Naseem is Vice-Captain because his bowling role gives him an opportunity to collect wickets across the innings, while Farhan’s position at the top of the order makes him the main Captain choice.
The main risk is relying heavily on Pakistan after one successful chase. Sri Lanka’s players should not be excluded simply because their team lost the opening match; Udara’s innings is a clear reminder that individual fantasy performance and match result do not always align.
Alternative Fantasy Combination
For a Sri Lanka-leaning, higher-risk approach, consider replacing Fakhar Zaman with Dasun Shanaka and replacing Mohammad Imran with Eshan Malinga, provided both are named in the confirmed XI. This shifts some exposure away from Pakistan’s successful chase and towards Sri Lanka’s middle-order hitting and wicket-taking options.
Alternative Captain: Lahiru Udara
Alternative Vice-Captain: Maaz Sadaqat
This combination is less dependent on Pakistan repeating its first-match dominance. It also carries more uncertainty: Shanaka may not face many deliveries, and Eshan’s wickets came in a match Sri Lanka ultimately lost. Use it only if the confirmed team sheets support those selections.
Final Dream11 Recommendation
For the second T20I, Sahibzada Farhan is the preferred Captain because of his top-order role and substantial first-match innings. Naseem Shah is the recommended Vice-Captain for his wicket-taking potential, while Lahiru Udara is the leading Sri Lankan batting selection after his 91 in the opener. Maaz Sadaqat also deserves close consideration following his half-century.
Avoid building the team solely around Pakistan’s series lead. Sri Lanka’s batting can still produce fantasy returns even if the team loses, and their bowlers took wickets in the first game. Confirm the final XIs before locking the combination, particularly for lower-order batters and players whose bowling workload is less certain.
Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricketwebs on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
Legal Disclaimer: All content is for informational and entertainment purposes only. Cricketwebs does not promote betting or gambling.