The controversy surrounding Afghanistan’s participation in the Champions Trophy 2025 continues to grow, as South Africa now faces calls to boycott their scheduled match against the Afghan team. Following England’s reported consideration of a similar boycott, South Africa’s Sports Minister Gayton McKenzie has publicly urged Cricket South Africa (CSA) to reconsider their involvement in the February 21 clash in Lahore.
Table of content
The Catalyst: Taliban’s Ban on Women’s Cricket
The core issue lies in the Taliban regime’s strict ban on women’s sports, including cricket, which has sparked widespread condemnation. Countries like Australia have already ceased bilateral series with Afghanistan, citing the regime’s oppressive policies against women as the primary reason.
McKenzie has echoed these sentiments, emphasizing that the cricketing world must take a stand:
“Cricket South Africa, the federations of other countries, and the ICC will have to think carefully about the message the sport of cricket wishes to send the world, and especially the women in sports.”
McKenzie’s Personal Stance
Drawing on his experiences growing up during Apartheid, McKenzie highlighted the moral obligation to act against discrimination:
“As a man who comes from a race that was not allowed equal access to sporting opportunities during Apartheid, it would be hypocritical and immoral to look the other way today when the same is being done towards women anywhere in the world.”
Although McKenzie clarified that the final decision lies with CSA, he made it clear where he stands:
“If it was my decision, then it certainly would not happen.”
Also Check: UK Politicians Urge England to Boycott Match Against Afghanistan
England’s Similar Dilemma
South Africa’s potential boycott aligns with England’s ongoing debate over their February 26 match against Afghanistan. Recently, over 160 UK politicians signed a petition urging the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) to take a firm stand against the Taliban regime by boycotting the match.
The ECB has expressed concerns about the situation but deferred responsibility to the ICC:
“It’s crucial to recognize the importance of cricket as a source of hope and positivity for many Afghans… A coordinated, ICC-wide approach would be significantly more impactful than unilateral actions.”
Double Standards in ICC Events?
While Australia has refused bilateral fixtures with Afghanistan, they continue to play against them in ICC events, raising questions about consistency in international cricket policies.
What’s Next for South Africa and the ICC?
With growing pressure on CSA to follow England’s path, the ICC faces mounting scrutiny over its handling of Afghanistan’s participation in global tournaments. Whether South Africa joins England in boycotting the match remains to be seen, but the issue underscores a broader debate about cricket’s role in addressing human rights violations.
Cricket at a Crossroads
As the Champions Trophy approaches, the spotlight is on the ICC, CSA, and other cricketing boards to decide whether they will prioritize the spirit of the game or take a moral stand against the Taliban’s policies.